DOUGLAS CLEGG INTERVIEW Page 1 |
|||||||
|
Harry Shannon interviews "I
had no point of view in my late teens and twenties, just a procreative urge
and a self-destructive bent." Stoker Award winner Douglas Clegg was born in Virginia, but has also lived and worked in Washington, D.C., California, Connecticut, New Jersey and a number of other states. He graduated from Washington & Lee University in 1980 with a degree in English Literature, taught school and then ran away to Paris. After a stint at CBS News in Los Angeles he wrote his first novel, “Goat Dance,” which sold to Pocket Books in 1987. Doug then jumped into fulltime writing, consulting, freelance editing, reviewing books and otherwise making his living through creative endeavors. His output has been impressive: Seventeen books, by my count, including short story collections such as THE NIGHTMARE CHRONICLES (a personal favorite of mine), novels like YOU COME WHEN I CALL YOU, MISCHIEF, NAOMI, and the thriller BAD KARMA - which is now out as a film. Doug Clegg recently completed a tour to promote THE INFINITE, the first hardcover ever released under the Leisure Horror banner. We met for the first time at a book signing for “The Infinite” at Dark Delicacies bookstore in Burbank, California. Harry Shannon: How have things changed in the years since the publication of your first book? Is the writing life all you expected it to be?
DOUG CLEGG: My life really turned around with the writing of my first novel - and its subsequent publication. I was fairly aimless in my youth - doing all the things you're supposed to do in your early to late-20s, none of which really add up to much more than fun memories of debauchery later in life. I worked as a teacher, a magazine writer, and an editor in various media, before I just sat down and wrote GOAT DANCE, my first novel. I wandered from Washington DC to Paris to Los Angeles, basically bumming around but getting some work done here and there.
But when I decided it was time to write that novel, I did it, sent it out, and it was bought by Pocket Books in 1987, when I was about 29. Just in time to save me from figuring out how to have some kind of career. Back to the question. The writing life is exactly what I expected it to be - a life, and a fairly good one, in which I get to read and write and travel and rant and just let my imagination loose on the world. It has given me a better life than I would've had without writing fiction. I enjoy writing non-fiction a great deal, but before I wrote my first novel, I really had nothing to say, and yet I wrote articles and various pieces in a fairly muddled way back then; now I have a fairly developed point of view. This might be age - I had no point of view in my late teens and twenties, just a procreative urge and a self-destructive bent. My point of view? Everything is potential for a story. HS: How disciplined are your work habits? Do you write for a specific amount of time and virtually every day? CLEGG: I write fiction just about every day, but not always. That's a strange little lie for me to make, but it's true: every day I focus on storytelling, but it's not always at my desk, writing. Sometimes it's just staring at a wall (something I really enjoy and consider quite productive), and sometimes it's getting involved in other projects. I've found that I have a fairly contrary nature - if I am told to do one thing, I will daydream the thing I'm not supposed to be working on. And I've learned how to manipulate this contrarian thing so that I get writing done in my head while I'm involved in something having nothing to do with the story. Basically, over the past decade, I've learned to focus - and I think that first decade was important for me because I needed to learn focus. I had a raw ability before that; I needed to learn how to zero in on the story and really immerse myself in it, even when involved in other activities. It makes the process of writing a lot more fun, whether or not I ever sell the story. I write a lot of stuff that I never send out - most of it's just for me. HS: This is another tired question, but we think it is relevant. Off the top of your head, what are your favorite authors and books, and who has likely influenced you most?
CLEGG: Harry, off the top of my head, I have a routine list: God (the Bible is the first epic of horror, unless you count Gilgamesh), Poe, Hawthorne, Charles Brockden Browne, Shakespeare, Marlowe, the folks who brought you Beowulf, Melville, Woolf, Matthew Lewis, Walter de la Mare, Rudyard Kipling, Joseph Conrad, Hugh Lofting, Beverly Cleary, P.L. Travers, Thomas Tryon, Shirley Jackson, Ira Levin, William Peter Blatty, Stephen King, Peter Straub, William Styron, Joyce Carol Oates, Patrick McGrath, Bentley Little, Iris Murdoch, Margaret Drabble, Isak Dinesen, Herman Hesse, David Silva, Rick Hautala, Ford Madox Ford, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Ernie Hemingway, John D. MacDonald, Colette, Guy de Maupassant, Dean Koontz, John Irving, Katherine Mansfield, Katherine Anne Porter, Christopher Bram, David Mamet, Elizabeth Engstrom, Richard Laymon, Poppy Z Brite, Tom Stoppard, Kathe Koja, Ayn Rand, Henry Fielding - man, if I could name every book or play that I've loved and read and felt influenced by, I would. Who has likely influenced me the most? Pick a name, they all have. Who do I re-read the most? It's a toss up between Hawthorne and Guy de Maupassant (maybe Shakespeare, too.) And oh, the garbage, too, none of which shall be herein named: the bad novels that I loved because of the scandal or intrigue involved in them or the pulped beauty of gaudy writing.
HS: That is an eclectic bunch! How do you feel your own writing has changed over the years? Clegg: I don't even think about it. I focus on story, and if my stories have changed, I'm betting that it's in my understanding of what to cut and what to leave in. Beyond that, it's only changed insofar as my understanding of the human condition has changed. I'm a terrible judge of my own writing: I cut and edit and still find it not as good as I'd like it to be. HS: How do you gather your thoughts, especially when it comes to structuring your novels? Do you use an Aristotelian three-act form, or something of your own design? In other words, care to share any tricks of the trade? Clegg: I generally just make it up as I go. HS: You've got to be kidding. Clegg: Well, okay. That's not entirely true. I take about a year to imagine the story. It slowly builds and builds in my head, and I don't do any writing at that point. Once the story becomes like a false memory in my mind, I'm ready to write. So, I sit down and just begin and slowly scrape away at my mind to try and translate the memory of how the story came to be in a fairly dramatic fashion (if that's what the story dictates). Usually when I revise the entire thing, I do think in terms of three-to-five acts. All this really means is: beginning, middle, and end. Anything that doesn't fit those three words, I toss. This doesn't mean I'm a hard editor with my stuff - sometimes the beginning is just a sentence to launch the whole thing and then the middle suddenly appears. Sometimes the end is just a page. The story itself determines its structure within the idea of an act. I do think Aristotle was on to something, though. HS: I have noticed a kind of rococo writing style in your work; richly detailed pieces of all shapes and sizes, some which can only be fully appreciated in context and even from a bit of a distance. How intentional are the decisions that lead you to that approach? Clegg: Not intentional at all. I write it as I see it. Anything that seems rococo is probably a flaw. I accept that I'll have flaws as a writer. I'll be the first to celebrate my imperfections. Whenever I see a negative review of one of my novels, my first thought is: well, yes, there are those problems - I wish the critic had been there while I was writing so I could've let him or her change the manuscript. HS: Let me clarify something. I meant nothing negative by "rococo," I was trying to describe those short, separately numbered, intense bursts of energy within many chapters. I find them quite cinematic, actually. Are they purely instinctual as well? I had come up with a story that was a riff on a haunted house, on the idea of a back alley abortionist, on a very fictional branch of Voodoo, and with racism. I really wanted to write a novel about racism within the framework of a horror novel. Having grown up white (thought I'd add that, and if my fans have a problem with it, I apologize to them! White people can be awful), and in and around Washington, D.C., I saw racism first-hand in the schools I attended, and in the social setting I knew. So, with BREEDER, I wanted to bring in the idea of white people gentrifying a neighborhood that had recently been African-American, and poor. In doing so, a whole back story comes into play about what one of the character's father did previously in this neighborhood, how this man ruthlessly and horribly used a sense of superiority and the weak power of the very cruel to destroy a young woman. There's more to it than that, but basically I hadn't seen too many horror novels deal with racism, particularly not in the direction I took it in BREEDER. Unfortunately, that theme of the novel got a bit muddled, and I've never felt great about that book as a result. I've always felt there was another novel in there that needed to come out and be developed more. But it was my second novel, so I forgive myself the lapse at this point. And many readers seemed to love BREEDER for its savagery. "...when you write a haunted house story, it becomes: something happened at a haunted house. And you can't really step into any room in the house without somewhat being aware that others have also stepped into haunted houses."
Clegg: Well, I don't even think of it as a trilogy in that sense. I think of it as William Faulkner's “Yoknapatawpha County.” In MISCHIEF, NIGHTMARE HOUSE, and THE INFINITE, there's a house called Harrow. It's practically an entire town unto itself. So each story is set there, but they're not terribly interconnected except that the same creator set the house in motion in the late 1800s. Each novel is fairly distinct from the other, and there is only some carry-over between MISCHIEF and THE INFINITE. I'm not much good at telling about my novels. They are what they are - each of these three stories deals with different points and different characters at one very haunted house - a house of infinite possibilities in many ways. Someday, I may write more tales of the house called Harrow. It depends on whether or not further stories come to me. But I'd encourage readers to read the books out of order - I think that would add layers to the sense of the house that reading them as 1, 2, 3, might not.
Clegg: Completely spontaneous. I got to the point of creating a map in my head, and thought, this is the map of all hauntings - it's the map that Shirley Jackson created for Hill House, and the one Richard Matheson created for Hell House, and for Tom Tryon in helping me to realize when I was about 13 or 14 that I might want to write horror fiction at all. All stories are the one story, and the one story is: something happened. But when you write a haunted house story, it becomes: something happened at a haunted house. And you can't really step into any room in the house without somewhat being aware that others have also stepped into haunted houses. Part of me wanted to also let those more cynical readers know that: yes, I realize two giants have written great haunted house stories within the past 50 years. I'm not pretending to duplicate their efforts - but this is a house at the end of another road than theirs. I probably should've named other streets Levin, King, Straub, Machen, James, and Hawthorne, but I didn't want it to be too jarring. HS: Tell us a little about THE HOUR BEFORE DARK, which comes out next year from Leisure Books. Is that another hardcover?
Clegg: THE HOUR BEFORE DARK is a hardcover from Leisure Books. All I'll say about it for now is that it deals with family madness and family romance and I've been having a blast writing it. And it deals with the idea of hero worship and murder. That's all I'm saying for now. Clegg: I don't know how many stories it will contain - a lot of 'em! It should be a fairly fat book since it will carry nearly all the stories I've had published since 1990. The book came together because Rich Chizmar is an amazing guy and wanted it after the wonderful and brilliant Matt Johnson of Obsidian Press had let it go for reasons of scheduling. Since I haven't yet turned the manuscript in, I just don't know how many stories it'll have. There should be a few new ones in it, as well.
HS: Okay, despite vague memory of a Michael Jackson CD, I love this title. Tell us about THRILLER, the Tor release coming in 2003. I assume it is Clegg: I've worked on THRILLER for a few years now. It's a strange book -- it's about things that if I told, it would ruin the suspense of the novel. I think I was working on it in my head as far back as 1996. Even if I told you the opening of the novel, it would be telling too much. Let's just say it deals with runaways in New York, with an unusual addiction, with savage murders, and it begins on Death Row with a startling revelation. There - that's pretty good without telling much. I hate to ruin these books by talking about them too much. HS: Understood. Do you perceive any pattern to how your concepts form; that is to say, do you write down a ton of ideas and then select one, or does Clegg: No, I never write down ideas at all -- I wish I did. I figure that the powerful ones for me will remain in my head and just germinate a bit. Despite the fact that a novel might take 6 months to a year to write, I usually have had to think it through a good two to three years before that. Then, sitting down and writing is much better and more enjoyable. Usually, a place and people just begin to form in my mind. And then a story begins. HS: You have a great deal of trust in your muse. Also, you’re the only writer I've seen literally invite a reader into his process via a website, Douglas Clegg.com. That’s pretty damned generous. What led you to make that decision? Clegg: I just wanted to do it for fun. Very little of what I do is strategy - I wish I were that smart. I just go with my gut, and figure: well, let me throw out a rough draft here or there, or do a serial, or just have some fun right now. I put a hundred pages of YOU COME WHEN I CALL YOU up at the old Matt Schwartz - run Horrornet site back in about 1998, and I actually got a great suggestion from a reader - to move a later part of the 100 pages up front. It was a good idea and I went with it. So, hell, maybe the readers will give me some great editorial advice.
Page 2. Clegg talks about BAD KARMA and why Andrew Harper wrote it |
|