THE CABIN IN |
||||||||
|
SERIOUSLY? It's nothing new in Hollywood. If any movie is successful, the filmmakers are going to be sued by someone claiming that it was based on their story, movie, whatever. Sometimes these lawsuits are legitimate and major studios have knowingly stole from a writer, thereby shaving the expense of $50,000 off their $150 million movie. Or you know, a week of craft services. Such business acumen among the major studios is legendary, and sometimes the studios lose. However, most of these suits are frauds. Right now Joss Whedon and Drew Goddard are being sued for their parody, THE CABIN IN THE WOODS. The 2012 movie was meant to be a riff on every Cabin or House In the Woods story, novel, and movie ever made. For those of you unfamiliar with such a motif, let me point out William Castle's 1959 opus, THE HOUSE ON HAUNTED HILL. So despite the fact that Cabin/House in the Woods/Rural area with redneck varmints afflicting strangers/outsiders is a standard Horror motif every bit as common as vampires and zombies (did I mention 1971's STRAW DOGS? 2006's THE HILLS HAVE EYES? How about 1978's I SPIT ON YOUR GRAVE?), author Peter Gallagher (not to be confused with the actor who starred in 1999's THE HOUSE ON HAUNTED HILL) is suing the two men for copyright infringement. Peter says that THE CABIN IN THE WOODS steals the premise - The Premise - of his self-published 2006 book, THE LITTLE WHITE TRIP: A Night in the Pines. Okay then, so what is that premise? According to Gallagher's complaint (court document supplied by The Hollywood Reporter), these are the similarities, I have to stop here because that premise is so astoundingly similar to (might one go so far as to say stolen from?) bestselling author, Richard Laymon's 1980 novel, THE CELLAR. If you haven't read them, then you should. Let's continue. "The cabin's previous inhabitants were murdered by the father of the family, who returns to terrorize the group of friends." Not to be confused with the similarity to the father of the twin girls in Stephen King's 1977 novel, THE SHINING. Or "Throughout, the friends are being filmed and manipulated by persons behind the scenes, inadvertently playing characters in a real-life horror show." Not to be confused with MTVs FEAR, which ran from 2000 to 2002. Or 2003's THE LAST HORROR MOVIE. "The cabin in the book is referred to as the "Brinkley Cabin" and in the film it is the "Buckner Cabin."" Later in the same complaint, Peter changes the cabin from its referred-to name, "Brinkley cabin" to "Brinkley House." when he writes, 4. The cabin the protagonists are going to is referred to as the "Brinkley house." Which is not unlike the house in Richard Matheson's 1971 novel, HELL HOUSE being referred to as "Belasco House". HELL HOUSE was later made into the 1973 movie, THE LEGEND OF HELL HOUSE. Is the press reporting this correctly? Is Peter really trying to credit himself with creating the Cabin In The Woods subgenre? Now let's encapsulate. Peter Gallagher's 2006 novel, THE LITTLE WHITE TRIP: A Night in the Pines, is about five young friends who go to a cabin in the woods where they are terrorized by a killer and, unbeknownst to them, are manipulated and recorded for a show. That's the exact plot of the 2002 Horror movie, MY LITTLE EYE, starring Bradley Cooper and written and produced by David Hilton. Filming and directing a person or persons without their knowledge to make a movie or show also smacks directly of 1968's THE SECRET CINEMA, 1983's SWEET GANG, 1998's THE TRUMAN SHOW, 1999's BOWFINGER, and TV's long running (15 years) Candid Camera. And of course, there's Robert Dunbar's NYT bestseller and award winning novel and "Cabin in the Woods" type Horror trilogy which began with 1989's THE PINES. Based upon Peter Gallagher's complaint, oh yeah, his work was entirely original. If anything, I'm flabbergasted that anyone would try and make the claim that a satire like THE CABIN IN THE WOODS is largely based upon any single story. Everything from CREATURE FROM THE BLACK LAGOON to HELLRAISER was thrown in there for good measure. Gallagher wants $10 million from the combination of Whedon, Drew, Whedon's company, Mutant Enemy, and Lionsgate. Read more about it at THR. Sept. 14, 2015 UPDATE - "While the two works share a common premise of students travelling to remote locations and subsequently being murdered, real or otherwise, that premise is unprotectable. The concept of young people venturing off to such locations and being murdered by some evil force is common in horror films." Now writer Peter Gallagher, the woefully confused plaintiff (to put it kinder than it needs to be) has likely wrecked any writing career he could have ever had, and all over his immense foolishness.
|
|
FEO'S BRAGGADOCIO | ||||||||
Some people think I'm more important than you (I don't, but they do. You know how they are) and this is their (HA!) evidence. INTERVIEWS Matt Jarbo's interview with Feo Amante at The Zurvivalist. James Cheetham's Q&A with Feo Amante at Unconventional Interviews *. Megan Scudellari interviews Feo Amante and Kelly Parks (of THE SCIENCE MOMENT) in The Scientist Magazine. Check out our interview at The-Scientist.com. REFERENCES Researcher David Waldron, references my review of UNDERWORLD in the Spring 2005, Journal of Religion and Popular Culture entry, Role-Playing Games and the Christian Right: Community Formation in Response to a Moral Panic (downloadable pdf). E.C. McMullen Jr.
*Linked to archive.org |
NEWS? |
FAIR USE - |