Masters of Horror |
||||||||
|
I've often wondered why it is that propaganda movies are rarely entertaining. From THE OMEGA CODE to the remake of THE MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE (2004), they all tank and are just dull witted. A friend of mine, who runs a local bookstore, once told me that propaganda movies aren't entertaining because the people who make them operate under the assumption that their audience is stupid. So they keep hammering on the same small point to brainwash the viewer into numb acceptance.
Review #3 of the Masters of Horror series HOMECOMING starts out with two characters in a car driving on a backroad, who quickly come across a stumbling zombie in a military uniform. The woman in the car goes bananas and forces her driver, a guy, to run the zombie down. Their car goes off the road and the camera focuses on their license plate, which reads BSH BABY. The next thing you know an Army truck comes down the road and unloads a truckfull of zombies. Merry Mishaps occur. From then on, we get the driver of the car as a narrator and the story takes us back to a month earlier. The driver is David Murch (Jon Tenney: NIGHT VISIONS [TV]), a Republican speechwriter for the current administration. He's on a TV fluff show reminiscent of CNN's Larry King Live. In this case, the interviewer is Marty Clark (Terry David Mulligan: DISTURBING BEHAVIOR), who is talking to both David and his future passenger, Jane Cleaver (Thea Gill: TRUTH), played every bit as cartoonish as the real life Ann Coulter she is meant to portray. During the show, a sobbing woman wants to speak to the President, to ask why her son died in a war which was based on a lie. David listens to the woman, then tearfully says that he wishes her son could come back from the dead. David soon gets his wish.
Before you can say George Romero ... well, no, you can actually say that name a few times before the zombies come out. All of the zombies are soldiers and they all want to vote. The reason they want to vote is to end the war that killed them, a la the old film, J'ACCUSE. This is director Joe Dante (THE HOWLING, GREMLINS, GREMLINS 2, THE SCREWFLY SOLUTION), and fans know that the man will stuff his Horror movie with as many references as he can, and this is alluded to in the DVD commentary by Sam Hamm, who points out everything from names on the tombstones to fiction references like THE MONKEY'S PAW. What's more, on the one hand, HOMECOMING pretends to have both sympathy and empathy for the soldiers and "Just want them to come home", but this is contradicted by the fact that Dante repeatedly shows the living soldiers as feckless cowards, shooting each other in fear, and cowering at the first sign of trouble - or - automatons blindly following orders. Both Joe Dante and co-writer Sam Hamm (BATMAN [1989], BATMAN RETURNS [1992], HAUNTED LIGHTHOUSE) try to play both sides of what they admit is their left wing agenda. They despise the military, really despise Republicans, yet they have to maintain the façáde of wanting the war to end because they actually "care" about the lives of the soldiers. Dante should have gone one way or the other: having it both ways dulls the edge of what could have been razor sharp satire. Don't misunderstand, I've no problem with the movie going whole hog and being as bigoted as it wants to be. Satire, especially political satire, should take no prisoners. Yet Dante and Hamm, along with co-writers Mick Garris (CRITTERS 2, THE FLY II, SHE-WOLF OF LONDON [TV]) and Dale Baily (who never worked on a movie before or since) seem to keep pulling back for fear of losing the very choir they are preaching to, while at the same time repeating themselves constantly as if they aren't sure their congregation can follow it. Just as a devastating point is about to be made, a corny joke is tossed out instead, or a contradiction of just what was claimed before. In doing so, HOMECOMING cuts itself off at the knees. Then it ends in a way that makes you wonder if the Dante didn't just throw up his hands and quit.
I truly believe that you can make a good propaganda movie that is also entertaining. I believe this because writers have done it so often in fiction. From Gulliver's Travels to George Orwell's 1984 and Animal Farm to Ray Bradbury's FARENHEIT 451 to Ayn Rand's Fountainhead. What's more, I can prove that entertaining, funny, and smart propaganda/satire films can be made. In 2004, Michael Moore made the propaganda film, FARENHEIT 9/11. It was witty, breakneck and, above all, entertaining. What's more, it made money, and I don't mean good money for a "documentary", but for a film with a $6 million dollar budget, it grossed well over $100 million at the box office alone. In doing so, Moore admittedly came under fire from those he forked, but so what? He also raised and set a bar, showed us all just how to do it, and even proved that there was a huge audience for it that was smart enough to Get It. All you have to do, is commit to your shit - and accept that your own audience is at least as smart as you think you are. Oh, and satires don't have to be funny, but they are SO much better when they are. Also, if you're going to make a Horror movie, then it has to be a Horror movie, and not a preachy diatribe. The series is, after all, Mick Garris' Masters of Horror. Two Shriek Girls.
|
|